Sometimes
when I think of some of the different things that people of different
faiths believe, and how strange they seem to me, it also makes me
think of the Eucharist. For those who do not believe as we do, it
must seem like the craziest notion of all; that God makes himself
present through the hands of a priest, in a tiny piece of bread and
some wine. What could be more bizarre than that? And we don’t just
believe that it is a reminder of Jesus or that it represents Jesus,
but that it really and truly is the body and blood of Christ. I also
think that it is a teaching so extreme that only God could come up
with it and get away with it, so to speak. What human being would try
to convince others that a piece of bread actually becomes the body of
Christ when a priest says certain prayers over it?
To
help us believe, the Lord has also given a great number of
Eucharistic miracles, to date over 200 all over the world and they
are the ones that have been officially recognized. In many of those
miracles, the host has miraculously turned into a piece of bloody
flesh. And with modern technology many have been studied by
scientists and it has always shown that is the real flesh and blood
of a man’s heart.
The
first time that Jesus gave the people this teaching— “Unless you
eat my flesh and drink my blood you cannot have life within you”—it
says that many of the people who had followed him up to that point
left him. They said “This is madness. Who could accept it?” It is
interesting how Jesus responded to them. He didn’t say anything. He
just let them walk away. He then turned to the disciples and said,
“What about you, are you going to go away too?” In other words,
“This is my teaching. Take it or leave it.”
In his
first letter to the Christians in Corinth (1 Cor 11:23-26)—which is
the oldest account of the mass that we have, written about 54 or
55AD—St. Paul says, “This is what I received from the Lord and in
turn passed on to you…” He doesn’t say that he received it from
the other Apostles, but from the Lord himself. Jesus, as you probably
remember, appeared to St. Paul while he was persecuting Christians
and the event turned his life around. Jesus appeared to him several
other times as well and Paul was so affected by what happened to him
that he dedicated the rest of his life to preaching about this man
Jesus, but the line that always strikes me is where he says, “This
is what I received from the Lord…” He is saying, “I
didn’t make this up and neither did any other person. Jesus himself
taught us this and taught us to do this in his memory.” So, every
time an ordained priest says the words of consecration at mass, “This
is my Body… This is the chalice of my Blood…” Jesus becomes
present in the form of bread and wine. How are we supposed to
understand this? We aren’t! I do not understand it at
all, but I believe it. That is why we are meant to fast for an hour
before receiving Holy Communion and why we don’t eat or drink, or
smoke in the church, to remind us that this is something unlike
anything else in the world. It is also a beautiful sign of how close
God is to us, that He would continually come to us in the middle of
our lives, each week, each day, to help and encourage us. He comes to
us as we are, not as we should be, but as we are. It is also God
himself who makes it possible to receive him, because we could never
be ready or worthy enough to even come close to the divine presence,
not to mention receive him. That is also why we always say the
prayer: “Lord I am not worthy that you should enter under my roof,
but only say the word and my soul shall be healed” (just as the
Roman soldier said when Jesus offered to come to his house to heal
his servant). It is also why we begin every mass by acknowledging
that we are sinners and asking God’s forgiveness.
There
are two extremes that I come across with regard to the Eucharist. One
is where someone will say to me, “Father, I don’t receive the
Eucharist because I really am not worthy enough.” Correct! No one
is worthy enough, nor ever could be, but since the Lord himself is
happy to come to us this way, we should not be afraid to receive him.
The other extreme is where people feel they have a ‘right’ to
receive the Eucharist without any kind of repentance, or need to
confess their sins, or change a lifestyle that is sinful. That is
also wrong. There is no question of this being a ‘right’ on our
part. The Eucharist is pure gift from God and for our part we must
try to approach it as worthily as we can, especially by confessing
our sins every so often. But the most important thing to remember is
that Jesus wants to give himself to us, and so we should not be
afraid to come to him. Remember that ultimately it is God himself who
makes it possible for us to receive him. “Lord I am not worthy that
you should enter under my roof, but only say the word and I shall be
healed.”
St.
Paul also warns us to be careful not to receive unworthily, or we
will bring condemnation on ourselves.
Each person must examine himself before he eats of the
bread and drinks of the cup. Anyone who eats and drinks without
recognizing the body, eats and drinks condemnation on himself. That
is why many among you are weak and sick and some have fallen asleep
(1 Cor 11:28-30).
If we
are living in any way that is not in line with God’s teachings, we
need to address it. Several years ago, after I spoke about this, a
couple came to me who were 48 years married. They said they had both
been previously married, but never got an annulment, so they were
never married in the Church. They realized that since they wanted to
receive Communion, they really needed to put this right. So, after 48
years, they both applied for annulments, got them and were then
married here in the church. I found that so inspiring. And that is
the right approach. If you find yourself in a second union, without
having got an annulment, then you should try and put it right. Come
and talk to me and I will help you sort it out. All of us need to
make every effort to do what the Lord asks. Receiving the Eucharist
casually is a big mistake and it is sacrilegious, that is, a sin
against what is holy.
Margaret
Clithero: Martyr for the Eucharist
In the
late 1500s there lived a woman named Margaret Clithero in the town of
York in England. She was a convert to Catholicism at a time when it
was against the law to be a Catholic. Priests used to come to her
disguised as cloth sellers, bringing her the Eucharist and she would
hide them. She never saw mass in a public church or heard a Catholic
hymn being sung even though she lived next to York Minster Cathedral.
It was an Anglican (Episcopal) church at the time.
She
was eventually found out and she was dragged from the butcher shop
where she worked and brought before magistrates and ordered to plead
guilty or not guilty, so that she could go on trial. She refused as
she didn’t want her innocent blood to be on the head of twelve
jurors. She said, “If you want to condemn me, condemn me yourself.”
The judge said, “Because you are a woman I will let you go free,
but you must promise never to hide these priests again.” He then
handed her the bible and told her to swear on it. So she took
the bible in open court and held it up in the air and said, “I
swear by the Gospel of Jesus Christ, if you let me go free, I will
hide priests again, because they are the only ones who can bring us
the body and blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ.”
|
York Minster Cathedral, England. |
So
just over 400 years ago, she was brought to St. Michael’s bridge in
York and given the punishment, worse than being hung, drawn and
quartered. It was called in English law, ‘the punishment most
severe’. She was pressed to death under heavy weights. It was to
take three days and she was to receive only a little muddy water to
drink to keep her alive. The executioner was bribed, and he put a
stone under her head so that she died within an hour as her neck was
broken. She was the mother of eight children, and some of them were
there when she was executed.
In the
little chapel that is there to her memory in York today, there is an
inscription over the door, which is a message for our times. It says
‘She died for the mass.’
So the
next time that you find yourself bored with the mass, or just not too
bothered to go because you are tired, think of her and think of the
many priests and men and women who have been executed for carrying
the Eucharist or for saying mass. God has given us an extraordinary
treasure in the Eucharist. May He give us new eyes to see what is
here before us.
“I
swear by the Gospel of Jesus Christ, if you let me go free, I will
hide priests again, because they are the only ones who can bring us
the body and blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ.” – St. Margaret
Clithero.
Eucharistic
Miracle in Buenos Aires
At
seven o’clock in the evening on August 18, 1996, Fr. Alejandro
Pezet was saying Holy Mass at a Catholic church in the commercial
center of Buenos Aires. As he was finishing distributing Holy
Communion, a woman came up to tell him that she had found a discarded
host on a candleholder at the back of the church. On going to the spot
indicated, Fr. Alejandro saw the defiled Host. Since he was unable to
consume it, he placed it in a container of water and put it away in
the tabernacle of the chapel of the Blessed Sacrament.
On
Monday, August 26, upon opening the tabernacle, he saw to his
amazement that the Host had turned into a bloody substance. He
informed Cardinal Jorge
Bergoglio (Auxiliary Bishop at that time, now Pope Francis),
who gave instructions that the Host be professionally photographed.
The photos were taken on September 6, 1996. They clearly show that
the Host, which had become a fragment of bloodied flesh, had grown
significantly in size. For three years the Host remained in the
tabernacle, the whole affair being kept a strict secret. Since the
Host suffered no visible decomposition, Cardinal Bergoglio decided to
have it scientifically analyzed.
|
Eucharistic Miracle in Buenos Aires 1996 |
On
October 5, 1999, in the presence of the Cardinal’s representatives,
Dr. Castanon took a sample of the bloody fragment and sent it to New
York for analysis. Since he did not wish to prejudice the study, he
purposely did not inform the team of scientists of its provenance.
One of these scientists was Dr. Frederic Zugiba, the well-known
cardiologist and forensic pathologist. He determined that the
analyzed substance was real flesh and blood containing human DNA.
‘For my flesh is real food and my blood is
real drink.’ (John 6:55)
Zugiba
testified that, “The analyzed material is a fragment of the heart
muscle found in the wall of the left ventricle close to the valves.
This muscle is responsible for the contraction of the heart. It
should be borne in mind that the left cardiac ventricle pumps blood
to all parts of the body. In other words, it is the action that keeps
the body alive. ‘Unless you eat the flesh of
the Son of Man and drink his blood, you cannot have life within you’
(John 6:53).
Dr.
Zugiba also said that the heart muscle was in an inflammatory
condition and contained a large number of white blood cells. This
indicates that the heart was alive at the time the sample was taken.
It is my contention that the heart was alive, since white blood cells
die outside a living organism. They require a living organism to
sustain them. Thus, their presence indicates that the heart was alive
when the sample was taken. What is more, these white blood cells had
penetrated the tissue, which further indicates that the heart had
been under severe stress, as if the owner had been beaten severely
about the chest.” ‘I am the living bread,
that comes down from heaven.’ (John 6:51)
Two
Australians, journalist Mike Willesee and lawyer Ron Tesoriero,
witnessed these tests. Knowing where the sample had come from, they were
dumbfounded by Dr. Zugiba’s testimony. Mike Willesee asked the
scientist how long the white blood cells would have remained alive if
they had come from a piece of human tissue, which had been kept in
water. They would have ceased to exist in a matter of minutes, Dr.
Zugiba replied. The journalist then told the doctor that the source
of the sample had first been kept in ordinary water for a month and
then for another three years in a container of distilled water; only
then had the sample been taken for analysis. Dr. Zugiba’s was at a
loss to account for this fact. There was no way of explaining it
scientifically, he stated. Only then did Mike Willesee inform Dr.
Zugiba that the analyzed sample came from a consecrated Host (white,
unleavened bread) that had mysteriously turned into bloody human
flesh. Amazed by this information, Dr. Zugiba replied, “How and why
a consecrated Host would change its character and become living human
flesh and blood will remain an inexplicable mystery to science—a
mystery totally beyond her competence.”
Only
faith in the extraordinary action of a God provides the reasonable
answer—faith in a God, who wants to make us aware that He is truly
present in the mystery of the Eucharist.
The
Eucharistic miracle in Buenos Aires is an extraordinary sign attested
to by science. Through it Jesus desires to arouse in us a lively
faith in His real presence in the Eucharist. He reminds us that His
presence is real, and not symbolic. Only with the eyes of faith do we
see Him under the appearance of the consecrated bread and wine. We do not
see Him with our bodily eyes, since He is present in His glorified
humanity. In the Eucharist Jesus sees and loves us and desires to
save us.
In
collaboration with Ron Tesoriero, Mike Willesee, one of Australia’s
best-known journalists (who converted to Catholicism after working on
the documents of another Eucharistic miracle) wrote a book entitled
Reason to Believe. In it they present documented facts of Eucharistic
miracles and other signs calling people to faith in Christ who abides
and teaches in the Catholic Church. They have also made a documentary
film on the Eucharist—based largely on the scientific discoveries
associated with the miraculous Host in Buenos Aires. Their aim was to
give a clear presentation of the Catholic Church’s teaching on the
subject of the Eucharist. They screened the film in numerous
Australian cities. The showing at Adelaide drew a crowd of two
thousand viewers. During the commentary and question period that
followed a visibly moved man stood up announcing that he was blind.
Having learned that this was an exceptional film, he had very much
wanted to see it. Just before the screening, he prayed fervently to
Jesus for the grace to see the film. At once his sight was restored
to him, but only for the thirty-minute duration of the film. Upon its
conclusion, he again lost the ability to see. He confirmed this by
describing in minute detail certain scenes of the film. It was an
incredible event that moved those present to the core of their being.
‘I
am the living bread come down from heaven. Whoever eats this bread
will live forever and the bread that I will give for the life of the
world is my flesh’ (John 6:51)